Home » Posts tagged 'Channel Enablement'

Tag Archives: Channel Enablement

Reps and Channel Not Selling Your Product? Perhaps They Think Selling it Might Be Embarrassing”…

I’ve had this conversation so many times with clients, potential clients and friends – the question is:

Why are the Vendor Reps and Channel Not Selling a Particular Product?

Channel Partners

For channel partners, the answers usually track back to not connecting to how the partners are thinking about selling – and where the product fits This topic was covered in detail in my Channel Not Selling Your Product series of posts, and in particular

  1. What is the Value Proposition for partners to invest their time in selling your product?
  2. Is your product and go-to-market program “Channel-Ready”
  3. What is the Sales Process for selling your product and how does it fit into how your channel partners sell?

 

Vendor Reps

For Vendor Reps, the challenges have the same root causes, with some different nuances. The bottom line is that they have to sell their companies’ products. But they do have some choices on which products they sell.

Of course they will sell the products where they think they can be successful, but this decision is more nuanced than we might think. Some of the variables that drive this decision include:

  • What products are customers asking about (so they can be reactive…)
  • Where is competitive positioning the strongest (so they have a high win rate)
  • What has the highest deal size (so they can win a few large deals and make money)
  • What has the shortest sales cycle (so they can close business this quarter)
  • What gets them into the key decision makers in the company (if their job is to sell deep at one or a few accounts)
  • The Missing X Factor???

But one key factor is missing from this list. Can you identify it? HINT: Think about human nature and what you personally would do when you are faced with a decision on where to spend your time…

The additional factor I am talking about is:

Where are the Sales Reps (Vendor or Channel) Comfortable Selling?

What drove this home for me was a recent client conversation selling a new technology. I was talking with their Product Marketing folks and we were discussing, “What information does sales needed to be successful selling our product?”

1. The first question to ask is, “What is it they need to do to be successful?”

We quickly agreed that we wanted sales to at least be able to create new opportunities (and that later stages of validation and closing would need specialists anyway). As a context for what we want sales and channel to be able to do, let’s use a basic sales process as shown in Figure 1 below. I talked about this dynamic in detail in my post on the First Natural Law of Enablement

  • Enable Them to Do Something (not to know something)

 

Figure 1: The Basic Sales Process

Basic Sales Process (generalist and Why)

 

2. The second question to ask is, “What information does sales need?” to be successful with Step #1?

I’ve found that that there is clearly a need to focus on the “Why” the product matters to Customers at the front end of the sales cycle, but (somewhat surprisingly) you also need to provide information on “How” a solution works, to serve as “proof” that the solution is real and proven.

But the client’s PMM made an additional point that made me stop and think, as he suggested another key “enablement” need…

embarassed person image

 

3. The third question to ask, and the one this was the “aha moment” for me…

“What information do they need so that they will feel confident enough in their knowledge of the selling context to RISK BEING EMBARRASSED selling your product…”

That is an incredibly important point. How many times have we all seen salespeople steer conversations back to their area of expertise and that they know how to sell. It’s not just a proven track record of success and closed deals. The missing piece is human nature…

Vendor Reps and channel partners will not spend time selling your product if they are not comfortable enough about the customer context, the solution, the products and the overall market that they feel there is a low risk of being embarrassed (which is yet another reason why “Sales Engagement” is the last mile of channel enablement)

I welcome any comments below — And make sure you “Follow” our blog (look for the “Follow” link on the upper left) and have your say. I’m also available as a public speaker, to support local and global events in Silicon Valley, or the rest of the flattening world…

For more details, and to stay in touch with this community, contact me or Subscribe to our “Climbing Out of the Box” Newsletter via the form below.

Channel Not Ready to Sell: Do You Make “Enablement” Real with “On-the Job” Training? (Part 5 of the Series)

A number of my recent posts have focused on challenges and best practices to “enable” your channel and drive revenue. Below is the list of the posts so far:

Channel Not Ready to Sell?

 

In the final post of the series, we will be talking about Natural Law #5

  • Sales Engagement: How Channel Enablement Becomes Revenue $

 onthejobtraining image

 

Let’s start with a baseline question – How much training does it take for someone to be able to do something effectively? That seems like a reasonable question, but it actually misses a critical point of enablement.

  • In order to be “enabled” to do something, people need to learn how to do it, and then they need to practice the skills they’ve learned

But think about the “enablement” programs that you’ve seen in your career. How many of them provided opportunities to practice what was learned? I’ve seen it happen it happen occasionally, but not often. Sometimes the vendor coordinates “Role Plays” in a workshop setting, and I’ve done whiteboard training where the participants broke into small groups and practiced whiteboarding to each other. But for many vendors Training = Enablement, because creating “practice” can be complex, hard to measure, expensive and difficult to scale.

That statement defines the dilemma that tech vendors face:

  • Partners need practice to be effective selling
  • But providing a programmatic way to get practice can be complex and difficult to scale

What can vendors do the provide opportunities to practice and get partners “enabled to sell”. The answer is something that the sales reps do every day – talk to customers (and to do it with partners, as the final step in “enablement”). What I am suggesting is connecting your “Enablement” plan to your Sales Engagement approach.

Those of you working in large vendors may be reading that suggestion with skepticism – how can a field Rep at a complex vendor and a lot of partners (like Cisco or HP) participate in “channel enablement”. After all, that is the Enablement Team’s job and is done by “corporate” folks, leaving the field to do their job, to engage with customers….I see your point, but hold that thought for a second.

 

When have you seen “enablement” work well, so that the teams in the field are confident that they can rely on the local channel partners to initiate and close sales opportunities?

 

In my experience, “enablement” works when there is a strong connection between the local sales team and the partners. That connection often occurs in smaller companies where the local sales team has responsibility to recruit and enable partners in their region, to help them in selling deals in their territory (but no so often in larger companies with fragmented responsibilities). Part of the value in this model is that the local sales team feels that they are accountable for helping to “enable” the partners in their region, to help them in selling. But a large part of the value is the local sales team, not only trains the partners, they go with them on sales calls and provide feedback on their progress. In other words, “THEY PROVIDE ON THE JOB TRAINING”.

That sounds wonderful, but it does not scale well to a larger company. You can’t expect the local sales team to own recruitment, on-boarding and the enablement process for all their partners. But the local sales team could be accountable for the “last mile” of enablement, which helping partners practice what they have learned by going after real sales opportunities together.

How would this work? The critical element is creating a channel program requirement that the “last mile” of enablement occur in the field with the local team. In this model, it would be part of their role to work with the partner to jointly engage with customers (and get on-the-job-trainijng). In effect, the process would work the same way it works for the channel-savvy and channel-friendly reps that you already have:

  • New partner or newly certified partner calls the local team looking to work together on some opportunities
  • Often the onus is on the partner to provide the first couple of contacts for targeting – after all, they have many local customers, just not with the vendor’s product (and what vendor does not want that???)
  • As the vendor sales team and partner get used to working together and have some success, the vendor reps bring the partner into opportunities
  • As the relationship matures, the vendor sales rep and the partner start to do joint account targeting and selling, with defined roles like “Partner SE runs the POC” follow up from the intial meeting…”

That process is really just basic sales engagement. But for many vendors, this process only occurs where you have sales reps that understand how to work with partners and drive revenue. With channel program design, there are always important details to define and operationalize, but this approach is a winning solution for vendors and for partners.

The opportunity is to build this approach into your channel enablement plan and “Package” the Enablement (see my recent post on this) this into your channel program to scale. This approach has the following benefits:

  1. Create a set of “enabled” partners who have both the training and experience necessary to help vendors drive revenue
  2. Help the vendor field standardize on a best-practices sales engagement approach that creates new sales opportunities and a community of enabled partners in their territory

I welcome any comments below — And make sure you “Follow” our blog (look for the “Follow” link on the upper left) and have your say. I’m also available as a public speaker, to support local and global events in Silicon Valley, or the rest of the flattening world…

For more details, and to stay in touch with this community, contact me or Subscribe to our “Climbing Out of the Box” Newsletter via the form below.

Want to Sell Solutions, But at the Velocity of Transactions? Connect Your Sales Plays to Provide a “Path” to a “Destination” (Part 4 of a Series)

A common concern among sales executives is the “velocity” of their sales approach. As we’ve been talking about in this series, concern about “velocity” often keeps tech vendors from trying to sell “solutions”.   In this series, I’ve been talking about the 4 Steps to “Sell Solutions at the Velocity of Transactions.”

Now that we’ve established a “Destination” and a “Path” for your customers, what should technology vendors do to get customers to adopt their Solutions and Products? If you looked at 10 sets of marketing materials and sales tools from across the industry for storage, networking, management, converged infrastructure, virtualization and cloud solutions, you would assume that the answer is – “build tools to sell your product/service”?

But as one of my professors in college used to say, “If you put that answer on your paper come Q day, you’ll get a BIG RED X, (Heh, Heh, Heh).” (more…)

Channel Not Ready to Sell? Maybe You Are Training Them Too Much Like Your Own Sales Reps… (Part 3 of Series)

The last 2 weeks, we’ve been talking about channel partner enablement and the gaps in industry practices that limit technology vendors’ success in creating revenue through their channels.

Channel Not Ready to Sell?

This week we will focus on Natural Law #3 – Channel Sales Training ≠ Vendor Rep Sales Training

Stop and think about that statement for a minute. Do you think it is true? I’d wager if you asked 10 colleagues in the tech industry this question over lunch, you would get nearly universal disagreement.  However, what I’ve seen working with tech vendors and their channels over the past 20 years is that,

                          while the sales training needs for your channel partners and vendor reps sales are similar, they are different in some important ways that require tech vendors to train their channels’ sales team differently than how they train their own sales reps…

(more…)

Channel Not Ready to Sell? 2 Simple Steps to Enable Channel Revenue (Part 2 of Series)

In last weeks’ post I talked about the “5 Natural Laws of Channel Enablement”, and how following these approaches can help technology vendors “Climb out of the Box™” and drive more revenue through their channels. We also talked in detail about Natural Law #1 – the importance of enabling your partners to do something specific – not just know more about your product.

The 5 Natural Laws of Channel Enablement

  1. Enable Your Channel to Do something (not Know something)
  2. Enablement ≠ Training – Training and Tools must go “hand-in-hand”
  3. Channel Sales Training ≠ Vendor Rep Sales Training – Enable Channel partners based on how they sell
  4. Enablement must be “Packaged” within a Channel Program, to drive adoption and channel revenue
  5. Sales Engagement: How channel enablement becomes revenue $

This week I will talk about talk about Natural Law #2 and difference between enabling your channel and training your channel…

(more…)

Channel Not Ready to Sell? Perhaps You are Violating One of the “5 Natural Laws of Channel Enablement”? (Part 1 of a Series)

Channel Not Ready to Sell?  First of a 5-Part Series

One of the critical success factors in GTM Program is how well a technology vendor engages with the channel to jointly sell.  The channel enablement team must face a broad set of challenges, ranging from how to onboard new partners, assure that partner sales teams, their SEs, and often their consultants have the information they need to be successful.  And these tasks need to be supported in introductory and advanced versions, for multiple products and solutions.  As if this wide-ranging charter is not enough of a challenge, “enablement” teams must deal with the inevitable tension between Sales Organizations and Field Readiness teams that train sales reps and SEs and feel that Channel is never “enabled enough” and don’t factor in that partners are not required to take vendor training (or to sell their products…).

In my experience, many of the common approaches to channel “enablement” are ineffective, and part of the many outdated, “Boxed” set of practices in the tech industry that have evolved over the years,  based on the old world of hardware-centric selling. These practices limit vendor success and revenue.  Providing proven alternatives to these types of practices is a big part of the Andrews Consulting Group focus, to help technology vendors “Climb Out of the Box”, and accelerate revenue for their products and partnerships.  Check out my post, “Are You Executing Outside of the Box? – The Checklist”,  to see see how your organization compares to these practices.

So how can technology vendors address these challenges, and drive more revenue through their channel? 

A good way to think of best practices for channel enablement is in terms of the 5 Natural Laws of Channel Enablement below. In today’s post I will talk about overall needs for channel enablement, and Natural Law #1 in more detail. (more…)

2 Alignment Problems that Destroy the “GTM Bridge” (and limit Revenue)

The challenge appears quite simple – How can a Tech organization set up and run their organization so that they drive revenue from their products and partnerships?  But think about your experiences with partnerships – like Bus Dev agreements, with Alliances, and with Indirect Channels (such as resellers and integrators), and I bet you can think of more examples of performance issues than of realized potential.  As I’ve talked about in many of my posts, many Tech vendors are set up to market and sell as if they were a direct sales organization – although many, even most, are heavily reliant on their partners to drive revenue.

The root cause seems to be “boxed” strategy and execution that results from organizations pursuing approaches that were developed in a different era, but no longer directly apply to today’s complex IT world of architectures, software-defined data centers and Hybrid Clouds. (more…)

Marketing and Sales Messages Not Aligned? Tie Your “Message Map” to a “Solution Blueprint” (Part 5 of a Series)

Over the past year, I’ve done a continuing series on what it means to market and sell “Solutions”  Today’s post is Part 5 of the Series

I’ve talked a lot about the advantages of using “Solution” (rather than “Product” messaging to connect to customers, and drive more revenue for your products, but the question I often get sounds something like this:

“OK, I see the advantages of using Solution Messaging – What do I do now?” 

That question is the focus of my post today.

The key to messaging Solutions is a tool that I call “The Solution Blueprint”, a visual tool that helps technology vendors communicate the value of their offerings in terms of “Solutions” to customer problems – and accelerate revenue. I talked about this tool in more detail in my Solution Blueprint post. In Figure 1 below, you can see an diagram that describes the key elements of the Solution Blueprint. (more…)

Startup or New Product? Building a “Route-to-Market (RTM) Bridge” as the Foundation for Revenue

In a number of my posts in the past year, I’ve talked about the importance and best practices for “Building a GTM Bridge” to create a repeatable approach to marketing and selling your products – and drive more revenue. This process is shown in Figure 1 below.

 

Figure 1: Building a “GTM Bridge”

Building an GTM Bridge

 

Building a GTM Bridge – to Make Your GTM Approach More Effective

What I have seen is that within a vendor, many organizations are involved in supporting the marketing, selling and delivering of products and solutions through sales channels – but often this alignment does not occur. The dynamics of why this process breaks down is covered in more detail in my series, Why do Companies Struggle to Build the GTM Bridge?”

Here are some examples of what happens without a repeatable “GTM Bridge”: (more…)

Are You Jumping to the “Product Sale” Too Early (and Missing out on Revenue Opportunities)?

If you are a regular reader of my blog posts the past year you have seen a lot of discussion about the importance of “Solution” messages to connect to customers (and sell more of your products). My most recent series provides a good overview of the issues and the best practices in connecting with customers with Solution messages.

By now, I’m sure there are some folks out there that are saying to themselves – “This is getting old, we all know that selling products works (why else would everyone be doing it?)” It is true that I’ve made the discussion too much of a battle between “right” or “wrong” approaches, when the reality is that the right time to sell Solutions is more nuanced. (more…)